Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation

Court: United States District Court for the Western District of New York

Precious Plate, Inc., et al. v. Olin Corporation, et. al., Case No.: 1:19-cv-00990

Sodium hydroxide, commonly known as caustic soda, is a commodity chemical used in various industries, including paper, chemical production, food processing, and textiles. From approximately 2012 until late 2015, caustic soda prices were either declining or flat due to industry overcapacity and flat demand. It is alleged that these conditions motivated the Defendants to conspire and combine to restrict the domestic supply of caustic soda, of which they control an estimated 90%.

Under this alleged scheme, Defendants are accused of fixing, raising, maintaining, and stabilizing the price at which caustic soda was and continues to be sold, as well as allocating or refusing to supply customers and refusing to bid on contracts while falsely claiming supply was tight or scarce.

The alleged conspiracy was facilitated by secret co-producer supply agreements between and among Defendants and their agents – both directly with each other and indirectly through third parties – by manipulation of a price index and by the characteristics of the industry.

Average quarterly North American undiscounted Caustic Soda prices declined approximately 6% between the fourth quarter of 2012 through the third quarter of 2015. However, the Defendants implemented numerous across-the-board price increases of more than 50% in the fourth quarter of 2015 that affected all caustic soda purchasers. As a result of Defendant’s alleged unlawful conduct, caustic soda prices in the U.S. paid by Plaintiff have been artificially increased by a substantial amount and maintained above levels that would be expected due to supply and demand conditions.

On September 26, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a motion to certify three classes of indirect purchasers of caustic soda. The motion is currently pending.

WBE filed this case in July 2019 on behalf of the Plaintiffs and a putative class of indirect purchasers for the harm caused by Defendants’ conduct.

Click here to view a copy of the complaint.

News Articles

Plaintiffs Largely Defeat Motion to Dismiss in RICO Lawsuit Against Centene Corporation, Alleging that Centene Defrauds Consumers through Sale of Its Ambetter Health Insurance Plans

On Thursday, May 2, 2024, U.S. District Court Judge Nancy L. Maldonado ruled that Plaintiffs in Havrilla v. Centene Corp. (N.D. Ill.) could proceed on the majority of their claims against ...

WBE Attorneys Named Among Law360 Legal Lions of the Week

WBE attorneys were honored alongside peers and co-counsel this week, as Law360 recognized the firm for successfully defeating motions to dismiss by John Deere in the publication’s Legal Lions of ...

WBE Appointed Interim Co-Lead Counsel in Amazon Tying Scheme Antitrust Lawsuit

On Monday, November 27 2023, U.S. District Judge John H. Chun of the Western District of Washington appointed attorneys from WBE to serve as interim co-lead counsel and consolidated two proposed ...