Amazon Photos Biometric Privacy Lawsuit

Federal Court: United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Hogan v. Amazon.com, Inc., Case No. 21 C 3169

State Court: Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois

Hogan, et al. v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al., Case No. 2021 CH 2330

WBE and co-counsel brought this class action against Defendant Amazon.com Inc. for violations of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The purpose of BIPA is to protect the biometric privacy of persons within the State of Illinois.

The lawsuit alleges that, through its Amazon Photos service, Amazon has for years violated the Biometric Information Privacy Act by (1) collecting the biometric data of thousands—if not millions—of Illinois residents without their informed written consent in violation of §15(b) of BIPA; and (2) failing to properly ensure the security of the biometric data collected through Amazon Photos in violation of §15(e) of BIPA.

Amazon collects biometric data through the facial‑ and image‑recognition software that is built into its Amazon Photos service. The facial‑recognition software automatically scans the face geometry of any person who appears in an image uploaded to a Photos account that has image recognition enabled.

Plaintiffs initially filed this action in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, in

May 2021, and the action was then removed to federal court by Amazon. In March 2022, Judge Leinenweber dismissed Plaintiffs’ claim of unjust enrichment, remanded two of their BIPA claims to state court for lack of federal jurisdiction, but allowed Plaintiffs’ §15(b) claim to proceed in federal court. Thus, Plaintiffs now have two parallel actions: a §15(b) claim in federal court and a §15(e) claim in state court. Both the federal and state actions are in the discovery phase.

The lawsuit seeks to provide relief to Illinois residents whose biometric data was wrongfully collected, harming the substantive privacy interests that BIPA was established to protect.

To view a copy of the federal complaint, click here

To view a copy of the publicly available redacted state complaint, click here.

 

News Articles

WBE Attorneys Named Among Law360 Legal Lions of the Week

WBE attorneys were honored alongside peers and co-counsel this week, as Law360 recognized the firm for successfully defeating motions to dismiss by John Deere in the publication’s Legal Lions of ...

WBE Appointed Interim Co-Lead Counsel in Amazon Tying Scheme Antitrust Lawsuit

On Monday, November 27 2023, U.S. District Judge John H. Chun of the Western District of Washington appointed attorneys from WBE to serve as interim co-lead counsel and consolidated two proposed ...

Big Win for John Deere Plaintiffs as Court Denies Motions to Dismiss in Repair Antitrust Case

Plaintiffs were handed a major win on Monday, November 27, 2023, as the court denied Defendant John Deere’s motions to dismiss in the case of Deere & Company Repair Services Antitrust ...